10 Legal Case briefs Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

10 intelligent briefs - Case Study Example2. Procedural History The skid was first heard in a Chicago court, before being appealed in the Illinois appellate court and later the Illinois irresponsible Court. The case was passed further to US Supreme Court for a final determination.3. Facts Terminiello, a suspended catholic non-Christian priest make a speech that was injurious to the personality of certain racial groups in an auditorium if the state of Chicago. this caused a public disturbance which forced the police to arrest him and present him to court.5. Reasoning The reasoning employ chthonian this case is that inflammatory speeches and fight manner of speaking are against the provisions of the first amendment of the US constitution. Therefore, the law does not protect the right of speech which creates anger and dispute. Additionally, the provisions of the amendment are against any speech or words that cause public unrests and disputes.6. Rule The trial court ruled that Term iniello was guilty of a breach of peace, because his exculpate entailed a breach of public peace and decorum. The both the Appellate and the Supreme courts of Illinois affirmed the ruling. The US Supreme Court ruled that the statute used to charge him was unconstitutional.7. Holding the Supreme Court held that the speech made by Terminiello was protected under the first amendment of the US constitution. It also held that the statute applied to convict him by the Chicago trial court was unconstitutional.8. Dissent Chief justice Vinson opposed the opinion, observing that the statute applied was suitable for punishing fight words. The same sentiments was echoed by justices Frankfurter and Jackson, who observed that reversing the ruling granted by the trial court and affirmed by both the appellate and the supreme courts of Illinois was a breach of equilibrium of power of the state and the federal courts.2. Procedural History The case was first held in a calcium trial court. The appeal was presented to the