Human and Utilitarianism Essay

Let me begin by defining Utilitarianism utilitarianism is the belief of doing what is right hand for the great number of people. It is a theory used to even up the usefulness of the happiest outcome and how it give affect everyone else. Now, this sounds interchangeable a atrocious theory, what would be better than making yourself and other(a)s bright? I found myself at root agreeing with this theory up until I re every(prenominal)y looked into it. At first I found myself thinking that non everything is about being elated both(prenominal) may go through to suffer for the happiness of others.For example, on that point were twain boats one contains lead criminals on death row being transported to prison and the other boat contains tenner happy, loving families simply enjoying a vacation. both ships remove bombs that will go off in a issuance of seconds, blowing up both ships and killing everyone. However, there is a solution. I for some odd reason get a device that sets off a bomb on ONE SHIP and demobilizes the other. Now the morally right thing to do would be what? What is moral and right? Taking lives? Or saving them? I do not count in contend theology or taking lives.I would simply ignore the Utilitarianism dash of thinking and walk away. I would allow nature take its course. If God has arranged this to happen, then it is meant to happen. Who am I to walk in and function God ? I have to say I agree with Hospers when he says A hundred men might gain great diversion from beating up or killing sightly one peanut human being but other mens lives ar not theirs to dispose of. (Hospers) A Utilitarian would approach this situation by asking himself/herself, what will knead happiness? What will do wakelessish for greater numbers of people?Why should the prisoners get to live? at that place atomic number 18 only three prisoners, and have do nothing groovy but cause harm to society. What have these families done? The Utilitarian wil l start to analyze each detail of the situation. They first see that there are only three prisoners as opposed to ten large-mouthed families. Hence, there are less people on the prisoners boat. Then he/she will see that the prisoners have already been sentenced to death, all being on death row. However, the main point will be that these are three bad men. Doing bad things, and causing pain and sorrowto others. Why should ten happy families be punished for their wrong doings? The Utilitarian would be for simply deactivating the bomb on the prisoners boat. Believing that killing them will bring greater in effect(p) and happiness to all. My argument to this is a human tang is a human life what if one of those men are really innocent and were convicted for a crime he didnt commit? What if the other criminal was to be released in the morning and go home to a family of eight children and a loving wife? Truth is we dont know.Utilitarianism fails to acknowledge that a life is a life- we are not speak up to be playing God. We dont decide who lives and who evanesces, even if it is for the greater good. We should just let nature run its course. Utilitarianism is a theory of evermore choosing pleasure over pain for the greater good of all. I believe that I have kept a closed mind towards Utilitarianism. The prisoners are already on death row, which means they are going to die for the horror they have set loose on our world. Why should I sacrifice the lives of innocent families, for a couple of men that have caused gloominess to all?I expect to off happiness, as does everyone else in the world. I mean does the world function over what the greater good for all is? Is that why we have soldiers in Iraq sacrificing their lives for the greater good of America? perhaps I have just overlooked all the positive outcomes of Utilitarianism. I find myself agreeing with a lot of what it has to say. I want happiness, I want innocent lives to be saved, and I want to strive for the greater good of all. I find it interesting how easy it is to fall into the comfort of Utilitarianism.It goes on with my morals and values and yet I still feel a sort of guilt. If I were to deactivate the bomb on the ship with the families and let the prisoners die, I would still be taking a human life. In my religion (Catholicism), a life is a life. We must forgive sinners and those who have sinned against us. But if these prisoners are on death rowwere they already bound to die? Would that already be in Gods programme? Was it God who sacrificed his only son for all of us sinners? I feel in a way that makes God himself a follower of utilitarianism.He set the example of offering his only son for our sins, to open the gate of heaven for everyone. Yet one of the Ten Commandments is Thou shall not kill. Is that not hypocritical? As I keep analyzing this situation I put on that God is God. He decides who lives and who dies, not us. I feel that its troublesome to stick to my morals when hearing the theory of Utilitarianism. Allowing someone to die at my hand for the greater good, for happiness of others. That just sounds selfish to me, kind of like the holocaust. Did all those innocent Jews endure experimentation and torture for the greater good of all?I mean, if it werent for these grotesque experiments we wouldnt know the uttermost altitude that crews in damaged planes target parachute safely to the demonstrate or find the cure/treatment for hypothermia. The Jews were used as wop pigs for the greater good of everyone else. Is that not Utilitarianism? So many people could have died of hypothermia if that experiment was never conducted. But how many innocent lives were lost to reach this conclusion? Is there a limit to how much sacrifice should be made for the greater good? There should be.This is where I dropnot connect with Utilitarianism, the particular that some sort of evil has to be done to help others. I see hypocrisy in this theory it wan ts happiness but wants to prevail out evil. People are evil, mean and rude. No one can be happy all the time no one can bring eternal happiness. This takes me back to my original example, who would I save? The prisoners on death row or the innocent families? The Utilitarians reckon to have a more interesting argument. Its funny how by pen this paper, my views changed. I look at the situation differently now. I do not feel as biased and conservative as before.My ideas have changed to a more liberal understanding sense. Why release these evil me back into the world? We have enough chaos and evil. These are just three men who chose their paths and now have to pay for it. They were sentenced to death for a reason, I will not be held responsible for the innocence of happy families, children, parents, aunts and uncles. They are not in prison because they have not done anything wrong. They simply stepped onto a ship, whose fate I now hold in my hands. I have made my choice I will deacti vate the bomb on the families boat and let the prisoners face death.