The Two Different Cases Regarding Capital Punishment :: essays research papers

The deuce Different Cases Regarding Capital PunishmentThesis In principle a case arse be made on moral pace both supporting andopposing capital punishment.Two different cases can be made. One is ground on justice and the nature of amoral community. This leads to a defense of capital punishment. The second isbased on love and the nature of an ideal spiritual community. This leads to arejection of capital punishment. judge AND THE NATURE OF MORAL COMMUNITYA central principal of a just society is that every person has an equal accountability to" animation, liberity, and happiness." within that, an arguement for capitalpunishment forms along the following lines any(prenominal) acts are so evil and sodestructive of a community that they void the ripe(p) of the perpetrator to life story.A community founded on moral principals has specific requirements. The right tobelong to a community is not unconditional. The privilege of living and pursue the good life in society is no t certain. The essential terra firma on whichcommunity is built requires each citizen to honor the rightful claims of others.The wanted live in a moral community essential be so highly honored that those whodo not honor the life of others void their own right to membership. Those whoviolate the personhood of others, especially if this is done persistently as ahabit must pay the ultimate price. This must be done for the sake of thecommunity which was violated. We can debate whether some non-lethal alternativeis a suitable substitute for the death penalty. But the exemplification of judgment iswhether the punishment fits the crime and if it honors the nature of the moralcommunity.LOVE AND AN holy person SPIRITUAL COMMUNITYChristian live, is unconditional. It does not depend on the truth or valueof those to whom it is directed. It is persistent in seeking the good of others disregarding of whether they return the favor or even deserve to be inured wellon the basis of their own w rongdoing. An ideal community would be made up pffree and equal citizens devoted to a equalizer between individual needs and theadvancement of common good. Communal life would be based on mutual love inwhich comparison of giving and receiving was the social practise. Everyone wouldcontribute to the best of ability.What would a community based on this kind of love do with those who committedbrutal acts of terror, violence, and mangle? Put negatively, it would not liveby the philosophy of "an eye for an eye,a tooth for a tooth, and a life for a